Basics
Section 232: Tariffs at the Intersection of Trade, National Security, and Executive Power
Trade
Published on September 10, 2026
Explore This BasicSince March 2018, the Trump and Biden Administrations have used Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs primarily on steel, aluminum, and their derivatives. Timber and lumber have also been subject to Section 232 tariffs. The expanded use of Section 232 has prompted debate over the economic effects of tariffs, their role in supporting domestic production and national security, their impact on U.S. trading relationships, and the appropriate scope of presidential tariff authority. This Basic provides an overview of the statute and its uses, outlines the economic impact of these tariffs, and examines potential efforts to reduce presidential tariff power.
Link to Additional Resources
- CATO Institute: National Security Tariffs on Tubas, Fridges, and Sofas?
- Coalition for a Prosperous America: CPA Warns USTR: America’s Section 232 Metals Tariffs Are National Security Measures, Not Bargaining Chips
- Congressional Research Service: Section 232 Automotive Tariffs: Issues for Congress
- Congressional Research Service: Section 232 Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum
- Peterson Institute for International Economics: Trump’s Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Are Counterproductive. Here Are 5 More Things You Need to Know
- Reuters: The US needs more aluminum – and it needs it now
- Senate Republican Policy Committee: National Security Tariffs: Section 232
- Tax Foundation: How the Section 232 Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Harmed the Economy
- United States International Trade Commission: Certain Effects of Section 232 and 301 Tariffs Reduced Imports and Increased Prices and Production in Many U.S. Industries
- United States Senate Committee on Finance: Breaking Down Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962